The term “fire weather watch” is currently trending due to multiple recent advisories issued for regions in the United States, particularly highlighting areas such as Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Middle Georgia. These advisories indicate heightened wildfire risks linked to specific meteorological conditions, drawing significant public attention and concern.
The news from Times Now emphasizes a high wildfire risk in several states, likely prompting many individuals to search for “fire weather watch” to better understand the implications for their safety and property. This direct connection between a public advisory and environmental risk has contributed to the surge in searches, as residents seek critical information regarding fire safety precautions in affected areas.
Additionally, coverage from the Wyoming Tribune Eagle showcases local weather forecasts, which may have also encouraged regional interest in fire weather watches, contributing further to search inquiries. WGXA’s report on Middle Georgia specifically addresses a fire weather watch issued for the region, indicating that residents may be actively looking for updates and guidance on how to respond to these conditions.
These reports collectively highlight the urgency and immediate nature of the fire weather warnings, which effectively mobilizes public curiosity and concern, leading to increased search traffic for related information.
Watch the Moment
Internet Reacts
I
We need **persistent servers** in matchmaking. Stop disbanding servers when a match ends. We don’t want to play with bots in a $70 multiplayer game.
I
Yep. Dice has thousands of words of patch notes here, and none of it matters if we don’t have persistent servers, accessible through a browser, running a map rotation. A damn shame that Dice ignored this obvious lesson coming out of 2042.
W
Exactly the same thing as I thought. It doesn’t matter how many things they change and patch. I cannot play the game because every match is mostly filled by bots. And even if a match ends up being 100% real players by the end of it, the lobby will disband and next match will start with bots again.
C
i just want to add that I like persistent servers because you can keep playing with the same group of people. that’s how you make friends.
T
Not happening
A
But if they didn’t disband the servers you’ll never get the chance to see all the sweet sweet skins
I
No matter how many times you guys post this and upvote it, it’s clear it’s not happening
A
Someone said its a question about money and it makes sense. The current matchmaking can be done with cloud servers that is on-demand. The other option costs more and its probably why we will never see it.
J
There’s no reason that cloud instances couldn’t shepherd the participants to the next round dynamically. This is already how portal works, as well as “Stay With Squad”.
S
So PvE players can’t have bot in portal, but pvp players are forced to play with bots because of no **persistent servers**? Your management of this game is a joke. You’ve somehow managed to fail both the casuals and the veterans in one single strategy. Good job DICE.
D
I was hoping to read that they added a solo/coop mode, sadly nothing.
S
When the game first launched, I used to enjoy playing PVE during the weekdays and PVP on the weekends. Then they destroyed portal But actually, I quite enjoy playing BC2 and BF3 coop modes with my friends.
D
Same, people might not know how significantly worse portal got pretty soon after release. It’s like the people that want bots can’t play with them and the people that dislike bots are forced to now with the constant match disbanding. Worst of both worlds. There should be a solo/coop mode that doesn’t have your match appear in the browser list.
O
I still remember the trailer for Portal. **FULL XP for Custom Experiences** If you didn’t play 2042, you might think, “why is that a big deal?” Because 2042’s Portal was garbage solely because of its XP restrictions. Seeing the restrictions comeback without being properly tiered for custom changes was not just 2042’s slap in the face but also BF6’s back hand slap.
J
I’m really sad they didn’t port the historical modes / maps to BF6. Portal would be amazing if it mixed the combined eras of 2042 with the custom map and logic capabilities of BF6. The legacy content could be ported over and expanded with each release, making it a sort of rolling “best of” sandbox.
F
This sums it up really well unfortunately.
7
I would at least like an option to wait longer and not have to deal with bots. Most of my games are filled with them from start to finish recently.
N
This is so true. Basically: fuck you, buy boosters
I
All I did was scroll to look for anything addressing server and/or matchmaking. I cannot understand how the community feedback has been so strong in regard to these items and it falls on deaf ears. What’s the point of a new gun if I don’t want to play the game. It is a critical issue at the foundation of the game. Such a shame.
T
It’s actually very impressive, albeit in the wrong way….still….impressive though 😂
M
Seriously no balance changes to Assault gadgets? Not even useless, handicapping stim? Are you serious??
S
No incendiary nerf, pistol buff or assault signature weapon buff either Edit: in fact every assault gadget besides the 40mm launcher, ladder, beacon and weapon swing is useless at the moment
M
Funny how good (I’d even say broken) are incendiaries on Support, but freaking useless on Assault. That shotgun and thermo launcher are ASS
F
The shotgun is so unbelievably horrible. I feel like it ADDs health to the people I shoot.
C
This actually made me laugh out loud. Thank you stranger
T
incendiary have easy counter, smoke
T
Yeah, let me just throw my smokes down as Assault, Recon, or Engineer.
T
you can prone and it will remove the fire and you will barely take damage. the nades themselves still suck to face against, but at least it helps taking 10-20 damage instead of 50+
S
The nades have a range that is bigger than the visible fire, can burn you through objects and walls, proning doesn’t immediately put out the fire, and touching the fire even for a splitsecond completely obscures your vision and burns you for multiple seconds. They’re extremely annoying
A
No buff to the Assault stim is crazy. It’s *by far* the weakest class gadget and has been a complaint since launch.
M
Buff ain’t the right word, this thing is literally blinding you on most of the maps. Only on Cairo and Iberian you can use it without annoying blur
T
It also fucks with audio making it more difficult to hear footsteps.
T
All they need to do is make it activate quicker and last longer. The effects are quite decent it just takes so long to use it gets you killed and it only lasts a couple seconds.
W
I wonder if there is a larger assault/class balance rework in the pipeline, though if so they should at least say they are looking at it. Assualt is still one of the most played classes so it’s understandable to me if they are hesitant to buff it.
E
It’s more noticeable with Assault because the stim is the locked gadget. Every other kit has terrible gadgets that no one ever equips. Like Engineer is RPG all the time, no point equipping other launchers. If you were locked into taking the Javelin people would complain a lot.
Q
assault players will continue to suffer the worst spread of gadgets known to man. also we will continue to have no smokes on any other class and like it i guess
S
* Adjusted in-world spotting range when firing a weapon without a suppressor or flash hider, reducing it from 75 to 54 metres. Just remove it
E
I agree but can understand why they’d be reluctant to do that: it would make flash hiders useless and suppressors slightly worse.
L
They could just make muzzle flashes more visible at range instead of throwing a read dot above their head, with compensators/muzzle break having larger but different muzzle flash types. Flash hider removes muzzle flash.
Y
you mean to say that the flash hider could be used to hide the flash??
B
**Flash hiders** exist to **hide** the **weapon flash** as they were always useful for. No need for auto 3d spotting anywhere. Sniper auto spotting is bad enough as it is.
S
It wouldn’t change suppresors at all since they only have minimap spotting.
A
They really need to reduce how prolific spotting is in general. Maybe make it so *only* the Recon class can spot, kind of similar to BFV.
L
The problem isn’t that other classes can spot you. It’s that you spot yourself just by firing
A
Right, that’s part of the problem, but I was just adding another way they can reduce spotting overall.
J
Please. It’s a terrible mechanic and no amount of mini-map nerf to suppressors will stop me taking them over being 3d spotted.
M
There’s got to be a way to incorporate a directional indicator as opposed to a specific point on the mini map. I think that would be an effective middle ground and is more true to how guns actually work, too.
M
The fact that they just don’t remove it is fucking hilarious. Who is balancing this shit?
B
“The announcement may change as we listen to community feedback” lolz What community DICE is listening to? Only Fans? I’m sure they didn’t listen to the Battlefield community. I heard people crying over 1. Air Radar 2. Constant call-in UAV bug 3. Attack Helicopter on Manhattan 4. Weapon progression. They ignore 1 and 2. Add more helicopter to 3. and adjust Battlepass progression instead of attachment progression to 4. C’mon DICE, at least don’t lie.
N
I’d also say about #3 that alot of pilots would also love to fly on other maps but its simply impossible on maps like firestorm due to tows being absolutely busted.
Additional Sources:
Wyoming Tribune Eagle – SE Wyoming weather forecast for Friday, Feb. 13 from WyomingNewsNow
