Why Is supreme court tariff ruling Trending Today?

The topic of the “supreme court tariff ruling” is currently trending due to heightened public interest surrounding upcoming decisions by the Supreme Court related to tariffs imposed by former President Trump. Recent articles indicate that a ruling is anticipated as the court prepares to announce its decisions on January 14, which is contributing to an increase in search queries as individuals seek timely updates on this critical economic matter.

News outlets such as CNBC and Reuters are emphasizing that the Supreme Court’s deliberations could have significant implications for the U.S. economy, particularly in the context of Trump’s tariffs. As these tariffs remain undecided, the uncertainty is likely driving both public and media interest, resulting in a surge of online searches for clarification and new developments in this case.

Additionally, with news that Trump is preparing an economic backup plan in response to the impending ruling, observers are eager to learn how the Supreme Court’s decisions may affect both the former president’s strategies and the broader economic landscape. This anticipation is further fueling the high level of search interest around the topic.

Watch the Moment

Internet Reacts

NotTakenGreatName • 1,956 points

We love deficits don’t we folks

toyz4me • 420 points

Actually, we love debt.

gdg6 • 95 points

The former leads to the latter

toyz4me • 18 points

Yep. One begets the other.

androidfig • 2 points

Just print more money, it’s basically free.

shadowpawn • 19 points

it is how trump built his real estate empire.

MyWorserJudgement • 19 points

That and 6 bankruptcies. Can we just go ahead and declare Chapter 11 too already?

shadowpawn • 5 points

China aint eating that $38+ Trillion shite sandwich.

newfor_2026 • 7 points

it’s like free money!

XSC • 74 points

Democrat as president? Hate deficits and debt. Republican as president? WTF I love deficits and more debt!

michael_curdt • 46 points

We got tariffs to pay for that deficit, so nothing to worry. Everything is going per plan.

StraightUpJello • 28 points

Aaaaaand it’s gone!

OpenGuard1993 • 12 points

I assume this is sarcasm

No_Storm_7686 • 3 points

Tariffs will pay for another 500 billion in defense AND stimulus checks AND paying of the deficits now?

AlGAdams • 18 points

Everybody says we have the worst debt, nobodies seen worse. Moody’s over there couldn’t believe it could they folks.

posser3 • 5 points

And there’s definitely tears in people’s eyes

irreleventnothing • 12 points

Didn’t you hear, the tariffs will pay for it!

GarlicDirect6624 • 2 points

Oh good! I’m so glad we have a smart president! /s

illforgetsoonenough • 25 points

He’s not going to be around when the real pressure comes on the debt. This country can’t sustain itself with a dwindling population replacement rate. The rich need to be taxed somewhere around New Deal levels.

GarlicDirect6624 • 7 points

The best I can do is increased spending and tax cuts…

cunningstunt6899 • 19 points

Deficits are bad when used to fund productive things like infrastructure. They’re good when used to fund the military industrial complex.

BrussianPlue • 2 points

Yea, it’s like deficits suddenly matter only when it could help people.

davelm42 • 7 points

You can run up debt as much as you want, when you know you’re not the one going to be responsible for it.

Eeeekim72 • 3 points

How is a war in the EU going to effect our growing debt?

StuartMcNight • 3 points

We are the YES WARS PARTY. We are the FISCAL CRAZINESS party. We love debt. We love deficit. We love America Last. We love murdering citizens. We love kings. Don’t you agree? This is what the Republican Party is about. Ain’t it? Ronald Reag… who? Fuck those commies!!!

onepingonlypleashe • 2 points

How else are you going to simultaneously repress the entire populace while invading other countries?

Sheyvan • 1,250 points

Completely insane.

mariusherea • 150 points

Like they’re preparing for a war

4materasu92 • 50 points

And presumably expecting the need to pay for a metric fuck-ton of soldiers that would need to be called up (i.e. drafted) for whatever war they’re planning.

HereGoesNothing69 • 101 points

You’re misunderstanding, bro. He’s the anti-war candidate. The recipient of the FIFA Peace Prize would never start a war, and he definitely wouldn’t do it to distract from the fact he’s a child molester

gunsandgardening • 27 points

Excuse me, hes already ended 19 wars.

catfink1664 • 26 points

Must be 20 now because of Venezuela

gunsandgardening • 27 points

Thats what I said, 27.

cogit2 • 2 points

Do we need a new term for “fishing story” to suggest things that are inflated like 1000x more and don’t even involve a fish?

uhhhwhatok • 7 points

More like dump 500 billion to his buddies companies and himself.

kenyard • 8 points

How much of Greenland could they actually buy with that money if they bought the land instead of just weapons? Edit Greenland is 533,747,624 acres. 1.5 trillion would be $2,800 an acre. Seems Greenland only rents land and there is no actual sale so no historic data on actual prices.. the above would probably be quite low for land also I guess in danish terms

Realistic_Arm_ • 3 points

~~Like~~ they’re preparing for a war

Kantmzk • 303 points

If democratic institutions work, this budget will not actually happen. We will see if they still hold weight in 2026.

Shadowthron8 • 246 points

If they worked he wouldn’t be in the position to demand it

xShooK • 31 points

The dipshits caved on the last budget increase. We will see.

Megalomanizac • 4 points

With a Democratic majority it would be different

xShooK • 7 points

If my grandmother had wheels, she would be a bike.

KStang086 • 7 points

“If” doing alotta heavy lifting there…

Sinaneos • 6 points

I think the US is waaaaaaaaay past that point, best thing you can hope for is a major turnaround in voting so that new people can take over. In the meantime, it’s a tsunami of shit drowning the whole world and the Dems are too weak to do anything about it

xploeris • -2 points

All of our elections involve deciding between one of two corrupt right-wing parties, because it’s so difficult for anyone else to get on the ballot and only a few % of voters ever pick them if they do. Also half the country doesn’t bother to vote. So no, democratic institutions don’t work, because we don’t actually have a functioning state/national democracy and haven’t for decades. Also, if you’re talking about our current Congress, which you are, then get serious because they don’t stop Trump from doing anything and many of them were basically elected to fail at their jobs. The first chance you have of Congress actually acting as a check on Trump is after midterms, although I wouldn’t set your hopes for anything more than a deadlock because Dems won’t do anything that displeases their wealthy patrons too much.

Areyounobody__Too • 0 points

> All of our elections involve deciding between one of two corrupt right-wing parties This has got to be the most brain dead take of the last 50 years.

PushingSam • 3 points

I mean, as European, by your standards we’re commies over here, but your most left leaning liberal democrat (Bernie) over there would at best qualify as still on the right side of the middle over here. On a global scale, yeah, you’re rather right leaning. The majority of democrats are fine with capitalism, and are also ffine with completely milking the market while being very liberal when it comes to the market and regulation.

–

-TheOldPrince- • 26 points

meanwhile government workers who continue to do essential work see their salaries lag

jimbo831 • 4 points

Invading Greenland isn’t going to be cheap!

Actually-Yo-Momma • 5 points

Don’t worry it’s paid for by DOGE savings. Right? Right…?