Recent statements from former President Donald Trump regarding a potential U.S. military intervention in Mexico to combat drug cartels have sparked significant search interest in the topic. Trump’s assertion that the U.S. military would engage with cartels “on land” has drawn attention and concern about the implications of such a campaign. As he threatens military action against these criminal organizations, people are likely seeking more information about the details and potential consequences of this plan.
The tragic news of a journalist being shot dead at a restaurant in Veracruz has also raised alarms about crime and safety in Mexico. This violent incident highlights the ongoing struggles related to crime and reporting in the region, prompting increased public curiosity regarding the current security situation and how it relates to the discussions around U.S. intervention.
These two converging news stories are likely driving the surge in search volume. The combination of political rhetoric from a prominent figure like Trump, alongside heightened violence in Mexico, creates a pressing interest for individuals seeking to understand the complexity and seriousness of the issues at hand.
Watch the Moment
Internet Reacts
W
FIFA peace prize winner.
S
But how could the winner of the historic FIFA peace prize surely do this?
G
This was predictable. Every single winner of the historic FIFA peace prize has attacked Venezuela, and threatened much of the Western hemisphere.
S
Plus they’re all pedophiles and child molesters. Every single one.
A
And they’re all bff’s with some dude named Jeff.
K
2024: “I will be the peace president.” 2025: “I think we’re just gonna kill people. They’re going to be, like, dead.” 2026: *threatens 7 different countries with invasion in the first week of the year*
J
If Trump cared about drugs coming into the US, he wouldn’t have pardoned a convicted drug trafficker. He only does things that will somehow benefit him, or if someone like Steven Miller convinces him it’s a good idea. He can’t even justify what he ate for breakfast, so he won’t have any logical reasoning, regardless of what he says, its all bullshit.
A
The USA’s war on drugs was NEVER about stopping the drug trade. It ALWAYS about being in CONTROL of it. Power is like a Hydra – cut off one head, 2 more appear. There are never any voids in power. The USA wants to be the head of it all
H
Wait so this week we had 3 people shot by ice/cbp, bombed Venezuela and took their leader, Vance said Ice will go door to door, we are trying to take Greenland, and planning to bomb Mexico. Did I get that right?
L
Oh also he took us out of 66 international organizations, like the IPCC.
L
I wonder if they’ll pull out of NATO too
E
It’ll fall apart on its own after we invade Greenland.
W
This is really what would start ww3. Not because of the direct conflict – that’ll get dealt with some other way, it’s not like the Nordic countries are gonna choose death, or people will line up to defend them against the US. But it’d utterly destroy NATO immediately. And with the US going full on imperialist, every other fuckwit in the world would see that not only is that now allowed and on the menu, but that the largest military alliance the planet has ever seen was simultaneously gone. The world would plung into war so fucking fast, as small conflicts start and everyone realizes that now is the chance to make their moves, before calmer heads have a chance to organize something new.
V
Just like Putin planned.
P
I’ve been saying this for years. Think about it. There’s no reason for the president of the US to do such a thing. If Denmark is your ally just pick up the phone and collaborate with them in the arctic. By going to conflict with your allies you’re destroying the alliance. Just like Putin planned.
F
A classic “teacher’s gone, class goes wild” scenario
T
That’ll open up the door for Russia and ChinA to do whatever they want.
T
“What a year, huh?” “Captain it’s January 9th”
P
You missed a few things. Cuba, Colombia, Iran. Hey, it’s hard to keep up with a lunatic.
–
It’s called “flooding the zone.” It’s Bannon’s strategy and it has worked well for them. The billionaire strangled media can’t keep up with all the scandals.
N
Interesting take, suggesting that MSM in the US *can’t*. Seems obvious to me that it’s an issue of *won’t*. Other than NPR, I don’t bother with US-based news anymore.
E
+ Epstein
T
He wants us to miss that one
P
And it’s working. Nobody is talking about Epstein anymore
E
Because it doesn’t matter anymore. He’s made it clear he won’t respect laws and nobody in the US will stop him from doing what he wants.
R
Yeah I think with the release he knows there’s no reason to fake anymore so might as well.
O
Did you see the raid on the high school in Minneapolis today at dismissal time? Bunch of people got arrested and tear gas was fired just as the kids were coming out. Our federal government is terrorists.
L
That was yesterday, but yeah.
O
I’m tired of 2026 already.
U
This week has been a long month
T
And no one is talking about Epstein anymore.
T
Did it make a flying fuck of a difference whether you talked about it or not? Honestly I’m not sure what you thought was going to happen. MAGAs were “angry and disappointed” for all of 5min when the files didn’t get released. But even if they’d actually cared (which they don’t), Trump doesn’t even *need* their support anymore. He’s on his second term. He’s got the supreme court, attorney general and congress under his control. He’s been impeached *twice*, is convicted of 34! felonies and still got reelected. You can talk about Epstein until you’re blue in your face, it won’t make a difference.
I
The “distraction” motive only makes sense when you assume you’re dealing with people capable of shame and self-doubt. They do not fucking care. A video could come out tomorrow showing Trump throwing babies into the Atlantic and not a dammed thing would come of it. The party would tell its followers not to trust their eyes and they would listen. The only context in which it’s correct is that each new action is itself a distraction from the last, and they happen in such rapid succession that no one can stay particularly angry or focused on a single one at any given time. I mean they’ve literally published this as a strategy that they intended to use to push through major policy changes as part of Project 2025. There’s no hidden agenda here. They told us exactly what they’re doing.
M
*gw mission accomplished gif*
M
The “no new wars” president is at it again
T
“No! New wars!”
B
Oooh, now it makes sense! I totally missed that one. Promises kept!
L
If the war on drugs has taught me anything, it’s that drugs always win.
S
The US needs to stop declaring war on concepts and inanimate objects
C
It’s like we discovered abstraction and immediately found it threatening.
K
War on Abstraction. That has a nice ring to it.
G
Yea man, weapons of mass abstraction
P
Weapons of Mass Distraction
C
“you called” – ADHD
O
“We did.” – Russian Disinformation Workers
D
“Oh! hi mark“ – bad actor
H
From the Epstein files
D
You mean the Trumpstein files?
M
Weapons of Mass Abstraction.. new work by Unitas Status opening Saturday the 12th 6-9 at The Shitsfucked Gallery
H
“you wouldn’t even be able to visualize the shit I’ve seen” – war on abstraction vet in 2050
Additional Sources:
CNBC – Trump suggests U.S. military will hit cartels on ‘land’ in Mexico
CBS News – Journalist who covered crime shot dead at restaurant in Mexico, reports say
